Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.4881
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarth, Tobias-
dc.contributor.authorMünch, Matthias-
dc.contributor.authorSeide, Klaus-
dc.contributor.authorAdam, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorKrautschneider, Wolfgang-
dc.contributor.authorSchulz, Arndt Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-20T08:39:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-20T08:39:54Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-12-
dc.identifier.citationTransactions on additive manufacturing meets medicine 4 (1): 644 (2022)de_DE
dc.identifier.issn2699-1977de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11420/14600-
dc.description.abstractAdditive Manufacturing (AM) is rapidly gaining acceptance in healthcare. Due to 3D printing of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) constructions almost any complex geometry, e. g. bio-mimicking implants or light-weight hollow implant bodies, can be produced. In this paper a direct comparison between PEEK and titanium osteosynthesis plates is achieved with a finite element analysis. By that, pros and cons of PEEK as implant material are discussed and different use cases are identified. For the comparison a generic osteosynthesis plate for diaphysis is designed. The exceeding of the yield strength even at low bending and torsional loads highlights the problems that occur when applying PEEK implants at locations which are affected by moderate mechanical loads. Since fracture stabilisation is the main function of osteosynthesis plates, stiffness is a highly relevant property of these. Therefore, a direct exchange of titanium to PEEK would increase the risk of non-union. Thus, a different structure or an improved material, e. g. carbon fibre PEEK composite, is required for loaded locations to replace metallic implants.en
dc.description.sponsorshipBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)de_DE
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.publisherInfinite Science GmbHde_DE
dc.relation.ispartofTransactions on additive manufacturing meets medicinede_DE
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0de_DE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_DE
dc.subjectosteosynthesis implantde_DE
dc.subjectosteosynthesisde_DE
dc.subjectAdditive Manufacturingde_DE
dc.subjectfem analysisde_DE
dc.subject.ddc570: Biowissenschaften, Biologiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc600: Technikde_DE
dc.subject.ddc610: Medizinde_DE
dc.subject.ddc620: Ingenieurwissenschaftende_DE
dc.titleAdditive manufactured versus traditional osteosynthesis plates : a finite element analysisde_DE
dc.typeArticlede_DE
dc.identifier.doi10.15480/882.4881-
dc.type.diniarticle-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.0208935-
tuhh.oai.showtruede_DE
tuhh.abstract.englishAdditive Manufacturing (AM) is rapidly gaining acceptance in healthcare. Due to 3D printing of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) constructions almost any complex geometry, e. g. bio-mimicking implants or light-weight hollow implant bodies, can be produced. In this paper a direct comparison between PEEK and titanium osteosynthesis plates is achieved with a finite element analysis. By that, pros and cons of PEEK as implant material are discussed and different use cases are identified. For the comparison a generic osteosynthesis plate for diaphysis is designed. The exceeding of the yield strength even at low bending and torsional loads highlights the problems that occur when applying PEEK implants at locations which are affected by moderate mechanical loads. Since fracture stabilisation is the main function of osteosynthesis plates, stiffness is a highly relevant property of these. Therefore, a direct exchange of titanium to PEEK would increase the risk of non-union. Thus, a different structure or an improved material, e. g. carbon fibre PEEK composite, is required for loaded locations to replace metallic implants.de_DE
tuhh.publisher.doi10.18416/AMMM.2022.2209644-
tuhh.publication.instituteIntegrierte Schaltungen E-9de_DE
tuhh.identifier.doi10.15480/882.4881-
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
tuhh.container.issue1de_DE
tuhh.container.volume4de_DE
dc.relation.projectKMU-Innovativ-Verbundprojekt: Elektronische Instrumentierung von Osteosynthese-Implantaten zum Monitoring des Heilungsverlaufs und zur Überlastprävention (IOMON)de_DE
dc.rights.nationallicensefalsede_DE
tuhh.container.articlenumber644de_DE
local.status.inpressfalsede_DE
dc.rights.creditline© 2022 Tobias Barth; licensee Infinite Science Publishing This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.de_DE
local.type.versionpublishedVersionde_DE
local.publisher.peerreviewedtruede_DE
datacite.resourceTypeArticle-
datacite.resourceTypeGeneralJournalArticle-
item.mappedtypeArticle-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.creatorOrcidBarth, Tobias-
item.creatorOrcidMünch, Matthias-
item.creatorOrcidSeide, Klaus-
item.creatorOrcidAdam, Christian-
item.creatorOrcidKrautschneider, Wolfgang-
item.creatorOrcidSchulz, Arndt Peter-
item.creatorGNDBarth, Tobias-
item.creatorGNDMünch, Matthias-
item.creatorGNDSeide, Klaus-
item.creatorGNDAdam, Christian-
item.creatorGNDKrautschneider, Wolfgang-
item.creatorGNDSchulz, Arndt Peter-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.project.funderBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)-
crisitem.project.funderid501100002347-
crisitem.project.funderrorid04pz7b180-
crisitem.project.grantno13GW0199C-
crisitem.author.deptIntegrierte Schaltungen E-9-
crisitem.author.deptIntegrierte Schaltungen E-9-
crisitem.author.deptIntegrierte Schaltungen E-9-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9840-3865-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4271-1890-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8629-4545-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Elektrotechnik, Informatik und Mathematik (E)-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Elektrotechnik, Informatik und Mathematik (E)-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Elektrotechnik, Informatik und Mathematik (E)-
crisitem.funder.funderid501100002347-
crisitem.funder.funderrorid04pz7b180-
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

27
checked on Feb 1, 2023

Download(s)

12
checked on Feb 1, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Note about this record

Cite this record

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons