DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBoer, Harry-
dc.contributor.authorDi Vincenzo, Fausto-
dc.contributor.authorBjörk, Jennie-
dc.contributor.authorGoduscheit, René Chester-
dc.contributor.authorHölzle, Katharina-
dc.contributor.authorSchweisfurth, Tim-
dc.contributor.authorVisser-Groeneveld, Jeannette-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T09:28:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T09:28:56Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationCreativity and Innovation Management (in Press): (2023)de_DE
dc.identifier.issn0963-1690de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11420/15000-
dc.description.abstractCreativity and Innovation Management has grown substantially over the last couple of years, both quantitatively and qualitatively. From 2016 to 2021, the number of submissions has grown from 287 to 395. Most of the growth was realized in Asia: The number of submissions from that continent increased from 72 in 2016 to 193 in 2021. The rest of the world remained (close to) stable: 215 in 2016 and 203 in 2021. Equally important, the Thomson ISI Impact Factor increased from 1.423 in 2015 to 3.051 in 2021 and further to 3.644 in 2022. This is not where our ambitions end, though. We want to be the ever-better outlet for authors researching, and practitioners working in, the fields we cover. Editing a journal with the ambition to continuously increase its quality while dealing with a substantial growth requires teamwork—teamwork among the editors and the editorial office, teamwork between the editors and their reviewers and, as surprising as this may sound, teamwork between the authors and their reviewers in a top-quality reviewing process. The purpose of this piece is to present and discuss some reviewing standards. In particular, we aim to share with our reviewers what we think is an excellent reviewing process. Furthermore, we formulate our ideas about what it is that makes a review an excellent one. The title of this piece is deliberately ambiguous. It denotes that Creativity and Innovation Management strives for reviewing excellence—as in an excellent reviewing process. It also denotes that we reach for the stars and hope to one day receive and, hence, review only excellent submissions.en
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.relation.ispartofCreativity and innovation managementde_DE
dc.subjectconstructive feedbackde_DE
dc.subjectpeer reviewde_DE
dc.subjectquality criteriade_DE
dc.subjectreview processde_DE
dc.titleReviewing excellencede_DE
dc.typeArticlede_DE
dc.type.diniarticle-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.abstract.englishCreativity and Innovation Management has grown substantially over the last couple of years, both quantitatively and qualitatively. From 2016 to 2021, the number of submissions has grown from 287 to 395. Most of the growth was realized in Asia: The number of submissions from that continent increased from 72 in 2016 to 193 in 2021. The rest of the world remained (close to) stable: 215 in 2016 and 203 in 2021. Equally important, the Thomson ISI Impact Factor increased from 1.423 in 2015 to 3.051 in 2021 and further to 3.644 in 2022. This is not where our ambitions end, though. We want to be the ever-better outlet for authors researching, and practitioners working in, the fields we cover. Editing a journal with the ambition to continuously increase its quality while dealing with a substantial growth requires teamwork—teamwork among the editors and the editorial office, teamwork between the editors and their reviewers and, as surprising as this may sound, teamwork between the authors and their reviewers in a top-quality reviewing process. The purpose of this piece is to present and discuss some reviewing standards. In particular, we aim to share with our reviewers what we think is an excellent reviewing process. Furthermore, we formulate our ideas about what it is that makes a review an excellent one. The title of this piece is deliberately ambiguous. It denotes that Creativity and Innovation Management strives for reviewing excellence—as in an excellent reviewing process. It also denotes that we reach for the stars and hope to one day receive and, hence, review only excellent submissions.de_DE
tuhh.publisher.doi10.1111/caim.12547-
tuhh.publication.instituteOrganizational Design and Collaboration Engineering W-13de_DE
tuhh.type.opus(wissenschaftlicher) Artikel-
dc.type.driverarticle-
dc.type.casraiJournal Article-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85149462273de_DE
datacite.resourceTypeArticle-
datacite.resourceTypeGeneralJournalArticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.creatorGNDBoer, Harry-
item.creatorGNDDi Vincenzo, Fausto-
item.creatorGNDBjörk, Jennie-
item.creatorGNDGoduscheit, René Chester-
item.creatorGNDHölzle, Katharina-
item.creatorGNDSchweisfurth, Tim-
item.creatorGNDVisser-Groeneveld, Jeannette-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.mappedtypeArticle-
item.creatorOrcidBoer, Harry-
item.creatorOrcidDi Vincenzo, Fausto-
item.creatorOrcidBjörk, Jennie-
item.creatorOrcidGoduscheit, René Chester-
item.creatorOrcidHölzle, Katharina-
item.creatorOrcidSchweisfurth, Tim-
item.creatorOrcidVisser-Groeneveld, Jeannette-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
crisitem.author.deptOrganizational Design and Collaboration Engineering W-13-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0796-8327-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9746-4498-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8639-2014-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6774-3912-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Management-Wissenschaften und Technologie (W)-
Appears in Collections:Publications without fulltext
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Add Files to Item

Note about this record

Cite this record

Export

Items in TORE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.