TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. OC6 project Phase III: validation of the aerodynamic loading on a wind turbine rotor undergoing large motion caused by a floating support structure
 
Options

OC6 project Phase III: validation of the aerodynamic loading on a wind turbine rotor undergoing large motion caused by a floating support structure

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.5088
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2023-04-06
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Bergua, Roger  
Robertson, Amy  
Jonkman, Jason  
Branlard, Emmanuel  
Fontanella, Alessandro  
Belloli, Marco  
Schito, Paolo  
Zasso, Alberto  
Persico, Giacomo  
Sanvito, Andrea G.  
Amet, Ervin  
Brun, Cédric  
Campaña-Alonso, Guillén  
Martín-San-Román, Raquel  
Cai, Ruolin  
Cai, Jifeng  
Qian, Quan  
Maoshi, Wen  
Beardsell, Alec  
Pirrung, Georg  
Ramos-García, Néstor  
Shi, Wei  
Fu, Jie  
Corniglion, Rémi  
Lovera, Anaïs  
Galvan, Josean  
Nygaard, Tor Anders  
Dos Santos, Carlos Renan  
Gilbert, Philippe  
Joulin, Pierre Antoine  
Blondel, Frédéric  
Frickel, Eelco J. P. M.  
Chen, Peng  
Hu, Zhiqiang  
Boisard, Ronan  
Yilmazlar, Kutay  
Croce, Alessandro  
Harnois, Violette  
Zhang, Lijun  
Li, Ye  
Aristondo, Ander  
Mendikoa, Iñigo  
Mancini, Simone  
Boorsma, Koen  
Savenije, Feike J.  
Marten, David  
Soto-Valle, Rodrigo  
Schulz, Christian  orcid-logo
Netzband, Stefan  
Bianchini, Alessandro  
Papi, Francesco  
Cioni, Stefano  
Trubat, Pau  
Alarcon Fernandez, Daniel  
Molins, Climent  
Cormier, Marion  
Brüker, Konstantin  
Lutz, Thorsten  
Xiao, Qing  
Deng, Zhongsheng  
Haudin, Florence  
Goveas, Akhilesh  
Institut
Fluiddynamik und Schiffstheorie M-8  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.5088
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/15240
Journal
Wind energy science  
Volume
8
Issue
4
Start Page
465
End Page
485
Citation
Wind Energy Science 8 (4): 465-485 (2023-04-06)
Publisher DOI
10.5194/wes-8-465-2023
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85152764774
Publisher
Copernicus Publications
This paper provides a summary of the work done within Phase III of the Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration, Continued, with Correlation and unCertainty (OC6) project, under the International Energy Agency Wind Technology Collaboration Programme Task 30. This phase focused on validating the aerodynamic loading on a wind turbine rotor undergoing large motion caused by a floating support structure. Numerical models of the Technical University of Denmark 10 MW reference wind turbine were validated using measurement data from a 1:75 scale test performed during the UNsteady Aerodynamics for FLOating Wind (UNAFLOW) project and a follow-on experimental campaign, both performed at the Politecnico di Milano wind tunnel. Validation of the models was performed by comparing the loads for steady (fixed platform) and unsteady (harmonic motion of the platform) wind conditions. For the unsteady wind conditions, the platform was forced to oscillate in the surge and pitch directions under several frequencies and amplitudes. These oscillations result in a wind variation that impacts the rotor loads (e.g., thrust and torque). For the conditions studied in these tests, the system aerodynamic response was almost steady. Only a small hysteresis in airfoil performance undergoing angle of attack variations in attached flow was observed. During the experiments, the rotor speed and blade pitch angle were held constant. However, in real wind turbine operating conditions, the surge and pitch variations would result in rotor speed variations and/or blade pitch actuations, depending on the wind turbine controller region that the system is operating. Additional simulations with these control parameters were conducted to verify the fidelity of different models. Participant results showed, in general, a good agreement with the experimental measurements and the need to account for dynamic inflow when there are changes in the flow conditions due to the rotor speed variations or blade pitch actuations in response to surge and pitch motion. Numerical models not accounting for dynamic inflow effects predicted rotor loads that were 9% lower in amplitude during rotor speed variations and 18% higher in amplitude during blade pitch actuations.
DDC Class
600: Technik
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

wes-8-465-2023.pdf

Size

4.23 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback