TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Linking life cycle sustainability assessment and the sustainable development goals - calculation of goal achievement
 
Options

Linking life cycle sustainability assessment and the sustainable development goals - calculation of goal achievement

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.5114
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2023
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Barke, Alexander  
Sodhi, Manbir S.  
Thies, Christian  orcid-logo
Spengler, Thomas Stefan  
Institut
Resilient and Sustainable Operations and Supply Chain Management W-EXK1  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.5114
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/15299
Journal
Procedia CIRP  
Volume
116
Start Page
618
End Page
623
Citation
Procedia CIRP 116: 618-623 (2023)
Contribution to Conference
30th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering Conference  
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.104
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85164297506
Publisher
Elsevier
Peer Reviewed
true
In 2015, the United Nations General Assembly proposed seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) intended to ensure sustainable development worldwide at the economic, environmental, and social levels. SDGs are now being used by some corporations in formulating and expressing business strategies. However, assessing the effects of corporate activities and products regarding their contribution to SDGs is difficult. In this paper, we have developed a method for linking life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) with the SDGs and calculating the contribution to SDG achievement. An essential part of this approach is the weighting of LCSA impact categories, which is typically done using equal weighting. This weighting method enables compensation of negative contributions by positive contributions in different impact categories but results in ambiguity in the results. This article identifies alternative weighting methods, integrates them into a computational approach, and determines their influence on the SDG contribution scores. The analysis shows that the use of alternative weights changes SDG contribution scores. However, the same product always has the highest SDG contribution score, regardless of the weighting method used. Nonetheless, the recommendations for action with regard to the total product alternatives would change depending on the weighting method.
Subjects
Sustainable development goals (SDGs)
SDG quantification
Sustainable development
Life cycle sustainability assessment
DDC Class
600: Technik
620: Ingenieurwissenschaften
Funding(s)
Sustainable and Energy Efficient Aviation EXC 2163/1  
Funding Organisations
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)  
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

1-s2.0-S2212827123000999-main.pdf

Size

508.12 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback