Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.15480/882.1597
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ramaswami, Sreenivasan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Behrendt, Joachim | - |
dc.contributor.author | Otterpohl, Ralf | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-23T07:57:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-23T07:57:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-03-21 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Membranes 8 (2): 17 (2018) | de_DE |
dc.identifier.issn | 2077-0375 | de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11420/1600 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) are among the state-of-the-art technologies for treating landfill leachates. Due to the complexity and variance in the composition of leachates, numerous combinations of multiple technologies are used for their treatment. One process chain for the treatment of raw leachate is RO followed by further concentration of RO-retentate using NF (RO-NF scheme). The aptness of this process train used by some landfill sites around the world (usually with the aim of volume reduction so as to re-inject the concentrate into the landfill) is questionable. This study investigated two schemes RO-NF and NF-RO (nanofiltration of raw leachate followed by reverse osmosis of NF permeate) to identify their merits/demerits. Experiments were conducted in bench scale using commercial membranes: DOW Filmtec NF270 and SW30HR. Filtration trials were performed at different pressures to compare the water and solute transports in the individual stages of the two schemes. Based on the water fluxes and compositions of retentates and permeates; osmotic pressures, energy demands, and other possible operational advantages were discussed. NF-RO offers some advantages and flexibility for leachate treatment besides being energy efficient compared to RO-NF, wherein osmotic pressure steadily increases during operation in turn increasing operation and maintenance costs. | - |
dc.description.abstract | Reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) are among the state-of-the-art technologies for treating landfill leachates. Due to the complexity and variance in the composition of leachates, numerous combinations of multiple technologies are used for their treatment. One process chain for the treatment of raw leachate is RO followed by further concentration of RO-retentate using NF (RO-NF scheme). The aptness of this process train used by some landfill sites around the world (usually with the aim of volume reduction so as to re-inject the concentrate into the landfill) is questionable. This study investigated two schemes RO-NF and NF-RO (nanofiltration of raw leachate followed by reverse osmosis of NF permeate) to identify their merits/demerits. Experiments were conducted in bench scale using commercial membranes: DOW Filmtec NF270 and SW30HR. Filtration trials were performed at different pressures to compare the water and solute transports in the individual stages of the two schemes. Based on the water fluxes and compositions of retentates and permeates; osmotic pressures, energy demands, and other possible operational advantages were discussed. NF-RO offers some advantages and flexibility for leachate treatment besides being energy efficient compared to RO-NF, wherein osmotic pressure steadily increases during operation in turn increasing operation and maintenance costs. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | de_DE |
dc.publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute | de_DE |
dc.relation.ispartof | Membranes | de_DE |
dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | de_DE |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | de_DE |
dc.subject | landfill leachate | de_DE |
dc.subject | monovalent ions | de_DE |
dc.subject | nanofiltration | de_DE |
dc.subject | organics | de_DE |
dc.subject | reverse osmosis | de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc | 620: Ingenieurwissenschaften | de_DE |
dc.title | Comparison of NF-RO and RO-NF for the treatment of mature landfill leachates: a guide for landfill operators | de_DE |
dc.type | Article | de_DE |
dc.date.updated | 2018-03-22T12:46:15Z | - |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.04376 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15480/882.1597 | - |
dc.type.dini | article | - |
dc.subject.ddccode | 620 | - |
dcterms.DCMIType | Text | - |
tuhh.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-882.04376 | de_DE |
tuhh.oai.show | true | de_DE |
dc.identifier.hdl | 11420/1600 | - |
tuhh.abstract.english | Reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) are among the state-of-the-art technologies for treating landfill leachates. Due to the complexity and variance in the composition of leachates, numerous combinations of multiple technologies are used for their treatment. One process chain for the treatment of raw leachate is RO followed by further concentration of RO-retentate using NF (RO-NF scheme). The aptness of this process train used by some landfill sites around the world (usually with the aim of volume reduction so as to re-inject the concentrate into the landfill) is questionable. This study investigated two schemes RO-NF and NF-RO (nanofiltration of raw leachate followed by reverse osmosis of NF permeate) to identify their merits/demerits. Experiments were conducted in bench scale using commercial membranes: DOW Filmtec NF270 and SW30HR. Filtration trials were performed at different pressures to compare the water and solute transports in the individual stages of the two schemes. Based on the water fluxes and compositions of retentates and permeates; osmotic pressures, energy demands, and other possible operational advantages were discussed. NF-RO offers some advantages and flexibility for leachate treatment besides being energy efficient compared to RO-NF, wherein osmotic pressure steadily increases during operation in turn increasing operation and maintenance costs. | de_DE |
tuhh.publisher.doi | 10.3390/membranes8020017 | - |
tuhh.publication.institute | Abwasserwirtschaft und Gewässerschutz B-2 | de_DE |
tuhh.identifier.doi | 10.15480/882.1597 | - |
tuhh.type.opus | (wissenschaftlicher) Artikel | - |
tuhh.institute.german | Abwasserwirtschaft und Gewässerschutz B-2 | de |
tuhh.institute.english | Abwasserwirtschaft und Gewässerschutz B-2 | de_DE |
tuhh.gvk.hasppn | false | - |
tuhh.hasurn | false | - |
openaire.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | de_DE |
dc.type.driver | article | - |
dc.type.casrai | Journal Article | - |
tuhh.container.issue | 2 | de_DE |
tuhh.container.volume | 8 | de_DE |
tuhh.container.startpage | 17 | de_DE |
dc.relation.project | Open Access Publizieren 2018 - 2019 / TU Hamburg | de_DE |
dc.rights.nationallicense | false | de_DE |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85046437494 | - |
local.status.inpress | false | de_DE |
local.type.version | publishedVersion | de_DE |
datacite.resourceType | Journal Article | - |
datacite.resourceTypeGeneral | Text | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.creatorOrcid | Ramaswami, Sreenivasan | - |
item.creatorOrcid | Behrendt, Joachim | - |
item.creatorOrcid | Otterpohl, Ralf | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.creatorGND | Ramaswami, Sreenivasan | - |
item.creatorGND | Behrendt, Joachim | - |
item.creatorGND | Otterpohl, Ralf | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | - |
item.mappedtype | Article | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Wasserressourcen und Wasserversorgung B-11 | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Abwasserwirtschaft und Gewässerschutz B-2 | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Abwasserwirtschaft und Gewässerschutz B-2 | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0003-3806-4571 | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0001-5306-2123 | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Studiendekanat Bauwesen (B) | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Studiendekanat Bauwesen (B) | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Studiendekanat Bauwesen (B) | - |
crisitem.project.funder | Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) | - |
crisitem.project.funderid | 501100001659 | - |
crisitem.project.funderrorid | 018mejw64 | - |
crisitem.project.grantno | FE 1045/1-1 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Publications with fulltext |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
membranes-08-00017.pdf | 1,19 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open![]() |
Page view(s)
526
Last Week
3
3
Last month
15
15
checked on Mar 30, 2023
Download(s)
410
checked on Mar 30, 2023
SCOPUSTM
Citations
11
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
checked on Jun 30, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Note about this record
Cite this record
Export
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License