Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.1873
This item is licensed with a CreativeCommons licence by-nc-nd/4.0
Publisher DOI: 10.2166/wst.2016.336
Title: Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests
Language: English
Authors: Holliger, Christof 
Alves, Madalena 
Andrade, Diana 
Angelidaki, Irini 
Astals, Sergi 
Baier, Urs 
Bougrier, Claire 
Buffière, Pierre 
Carballa, Marta 
Wilde, Vinnie de 
Ebertseder, Florian 
Fernández, Belén 
Ficara, Elena 
Fotidis, Ioannis A. 
Frigon, Jean-Claude 
Fruteau de Laclos, Hélène 
Ghasimi, Dara S. M. 
Hack, Gabrielle 
Hartel, Mathias 
Heerenklage, Jörn 
Sárvári Horváth, Ilona 
Jeníček, Pavel 
Koch, Konrad 
Krautwald, Judith 
Lizasoain, Javier 
Liu, Jing 
Mosberger, Lona 
Nistor, Mihaela 
Oechsner, Hans 
Oliveira, João Vítor 
Paterson, Mark 
Pauss, André 
Pommier, Sébastien 
Porqueddu, Isabella 
Raposo Bejines, Francisco 
Ribeiro, Thierry 
Rüsch Pfund, Florian 
Strömberg, Sten 
Torrijos, Michel 
Eekert, Miriam H. A. van 
Lier, Jules B. van 
Wedwitschka, Harald 
Wierinck, Isabella 
Keywords: Anaerobiosis;Biofuels;Biotechnology;Laboratories;Methane;Reproducibility of Results
Issue Date: 14-Dec-2016
Publisher: IWA Publishing
Source: Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research 11 (74): 2515-2522-2522 (2016-12)
Journal or Series Name: Water science and technology 
Abstract (english): Production of biogas from different organic materials is a most interesting source of renewable energy. The biomethane potential (BMP) of these materials has to be determined to get insight in design parameters for anaerobic digesters. Although several norms and guidelines for BMP tests exist, inter-laboratory tests regularly show high variability of BMPs for the same substrate. A workshop was held in June 2015, in Leysin, Switzerland, with over 40 attendees from 30 laboratories around the world, to agree on common solutions to the conundrum of inconsistent BMP test results. This paper presents the consensus of the intense roundtable discussions and cross-comparison of methodologies used in respective laboratories. Compulsory elements for the validation of BMP results were defined. They include the minimal number of replicates, the request to carry out blank and positive control assays, a criterion for the test duration, details on BMP calculation, and last but not least criteria for rejection of the BMP tests. Finally, recommendations on items that strongly influence the outcome of BMP tests such as inoculum characteristics, substrate preparation, test setup, and data analysis are presented to increase the probability of obtaining validated and reproducible results.
URI: http://tubdok.tub.tuhh.de/handle/11420/1876
DOI: 10.15480/882.1873
ISSN: 1996-9732
Institute: Umwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft V-9 
Type: (wissenschaftlicher) Artikel
Appears in Collections:Publications (tub.dok)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
wst074112515.pdfVerlags-PDF174,09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

21
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Apr 23, 2019

Download(s)

10
checked on Apr 23, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons