Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Publisher DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.023
Title: Flue gas concentrations and efficiencies of a coal-fired Oxyfuel power plant with circulating fluidised bed combustion
Language: English
Authors: Weng, Matthias 
Günther, Claas Georg 
Kather, Alfons 
Keywords: CCS;Oxyfuel;flue gas recirculation;circulating fluidised bed;CFBC
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2013
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: Energy Procedia (37): 1480-1489 (2013)
Journal or Series Name: Energy procedia 
Abstract (english): In contrast to an Oxyfuel process with pulverised coal (PC) firing, possible advantages of a circulating fluidised bed combustion (CFBC) are the in-furnace sulphur dioxide removal - no additional sulphur dioxide removal downstream the steam generator might be necessary - And the feasibility for concepts with a reduced flue gas recirculation. In [1] design conditions for the overall process of an Oxyfuel CFBC with highest flue gas recirculation up to 75 % are compared to concepts with less recycled flue gas. Compared to [1], this work is not focussed on design aspects of the steam generator but rather on the changing structure of auxiliary power demand of an integrated overall process caused by a reduced flue gas recirculation. At full load operation and under realistic boundary conditions achievable efficiencies of an Oxyfuel CFBC will be examined and compared to the PC-fired Oxyfuel process. © 2013 The Author.
Conference: 11th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 18-22 November 2012, Kyoto, Japan 
DOI: 10.15480/882.2149
ISSN: 1876-6102
Institute: Energietechnik M-5 
Type: (wissenschaftlicher) Artikel
License: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives)
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1-s2.0-S187661021300266X-main.pdfVerlags-PDF364,87 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Oct 1, 2020


checked on Oct 1, 2020

Google ScholarTM


Note about this record


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons