TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Decision-makers’ underestimation of user innovation
 
Options

Decision-makers’ underestimation of user innovation

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2291
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2019-03-02
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Bradonjic, Philip  
Franke, Nikolaus  
Lüthje, Christian  
Institut
Innovationsmarketing W-3  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.2291
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/2812
Journal
Research policy  
Volume
48
Issue
6
Start Page
1354
End Page
1361
Citation
Research Policy 6 (48): 1354-1361 (2019-07)
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.020
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85062231312
Publisher
Elsevier
In the past few decades, much research has documented the importance of users as sources of innovations. Over the last 10 years, Research Policy alone has published 56 research articles investigating this phenomenon. We ask to what degree the findings of users as innovators have been absorbed by decision-makers responsible for new product development (managers) and by those who shape the contextual conditions for innovation (policy makers and public administration). A realistic perception of the sources of innovation is important as it constitutes the basis for a rational allocation of resources and thus indirectly impacts the innovation performance of companies and societies at large. In a large-scale survey of n = 1500 decision-makers, we found support for a substantial underestimation of users as a source of innovation: While the true proportion of user innovation among the most valuable 1678 innovations in nine industries is 54.4% (as established in existing research articles), decision-makers estimate it to be 21.7%. A content analysis of transfer media (450 academic textbooks, popular innovation books, and business articles) underscores this theory-practice gap: Of 3469 text paragraphs dealing with the sources of innovation, only 2.7% mention users as innovators. We develop six propositions on the reasons for and consequences of this underestimation that may serve as a starting point for future research and practical consequences.
Subjects
User innovation
Sources of innovation
Theory practice gap
Decision-makers
Biases
DDC Class
330: Wirtschaft
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

1-s2.0-S0048733319300460-main.pdf

Size

610.97 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback