TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Sustainable decision making under uncertainty: A case study in dredged material management
 
Options

Sustainable decision making under uncertainty: A case study in dredged material management

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2383
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2014
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Scheffler, Alexander  
Roth, Thomas  
Ahlf, Wolfgang  
Institut
Umwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft V-9  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.2383
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/3176
Journal
Environmental sciences Europe  
Volume
26
Start Page
1
End Page
12
Article Number
7
Citation
Environmental Sciences Europe volume 26, Article number: 7 (2014)
Publisher DOI
10.1186/2190-4715-26-7
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84900000089
Publisher
Springer
Background: The port of Lübeck is one of Germany's most important harbours for goods traffic to and from the Baltic Sea Region. Sedimentation from the River Trave requires regularly maintenance dredging as well as capital dredging operations in order to maintain the operational capability of the port. A range of solutions for sustainable dredged material handling exist and an assessment of these options often proves to be challenging for decision makers. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) provides decision support by processing different data sets and evaluating suitable options in a rational way. Using the stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis (SMAA)-TRI method with a modification of a previously developed computerised model for decision support in dredged material management, this study was performed to test decision support under uncertainty. Results: The analysis endorsed that relocation to a dredged discharge pool and capping of an ammunition disposal site are viable options for Lübeck port. On the other hand, the use of dredged material from port expansion and its disposal on land are considered to be of very low sustainability under the given circumstances. Conclusions: The case study demonstrates capabilities as well as boundaries of computer-aided decision making under the premise of incomplete information. Despite uncertainties, sustainable decision making is possible with appropriate MCDA methodologies although minimum requirements concerning both data quality and data quantity must be fulfilled. Consequently, one possible alternative could not be integrated into the case study due to incomplete information. © 2014 Scheffler et al.
Subjects
Decision support
Dredged material management
MCDA
Risk analysis
Sustainability
Uncertainty
DDC Class
620: Ingenieurwissenschaften
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

2190-4715-26-7.pdf

Size

633.67 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback