DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÜreten, Selin-
dc.contributor.authorKrause, Dieter-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-25T11:55:16Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-25T11:55:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 9 (DS 87-9): 99-108 (2017)de_DE
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-904670-97-1de_DE
dc.identifier.issn2220-4334de_DE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11420/3871-
dc.description.abstractThough shown to be of support to the designer, design method acceptance is still an issue to the design society today. Requirements and concepts in general derived from fundamental learning principles have been developed to enhance learning. This study is an experimental study to collect impressions about design method acceptance based on predefined criteria for facilitated use of design catalogues. Two workshops in sequence were conducted with students of advanced integrated product development courses to teach and train them in design catalogues. The control group applied twice a discursive solution finding process with design catalogues whereas the test group first worked intuitively with the brainstorming method and just in the second stage with a discursive solution finding process. Results have shown differences in the perception of both groups and revealed an improved method acceptance for groups who worked discursively twice. The groups working intuitively first and then discursively claimed that the design catalogues rather restricted their creativity but were considered useful as an additional tool. Implications for enhancing the learning experience could be deduced.en
dc.language.isoende_DE
dc.publisherCurran Associates, Inc.de_DE
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICEDde_DE
dc.subjectDesign learningde_DE
dc.subjectEducationde_DE
dc.subjectHuman behaviour in designde_DE
dc.subjectIntegrated product developmentde_DE
dc.subjectTrainingde_DE
dc.subject.ddc600: Technikde_DE
dc.titleDiscursive vs. intuitive - An experimental study to facilitate the use of design cataloguesde_DE
dc.typeinProceedingsde_DE
dc.type.dinicontributionToPeriodical-
dcterms.DCMITypeText-
tuhh.abstract.englishThough shown to be of support to the designer, design method acceptance is still an issue to the design society today. Requirements and concepts in general derived from fundamental learning principles have been developed to enhance learning. This study is an experimental study to collect impressions about design method acceptance based on predefined criteria for facilitated use of design catalogues. Two workshops in sequence were conducted with students of advanced integrated product development courses to teach and train them in design catalogues. The control group applied twice a discursive solution finding process with design catalogues whereas the test group first worked intuitively with the brainstorming method and just in the second stage with a discursive solution finding process. Results have shown differences in the perception of both groups and revealed an improved method acceptance for groups who worked discursively twice. The groups working intuitively first and then discursively claimed that the design catalogues rather restricted their creativity but were considered useful as an additional tool. Implications for enhancing the learning experience could be deduced.de_DE
tuhh.publication.instituteProduktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik M-17de_DE
tuhh.type.opusInProceedings (Aufsatz / Paper einer Konferenz etc.)-
dc.type.drivercontributionToPeriodical-
dc.type.casraiConference Paper-
tuhh.container.volume9de_DE
tuhh.container.startpage99de_DE
tuhh.container.endpage108de_DE
dc.relation.conference21st International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2017de_DE
tuhh.relation.ispartofseriesDSde_DE
tuhh.relation.ispartofseriesnumber87-9de_DE
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85029740278de_DE
datacite.resourceTypeConference Paper-
datacite.resourceTypeGeneralConferencePaper-
item.seriesrefDS;87-9-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeinProceedings-
item.creatorOrcidÜreten, Selin-
item.creatorOrcidKrause, Dieter-
item.creatorGNDÜreten, Selin-
item.creatorGNDKrause, Dieter-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.mappedtypeinProceedings-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794-
item.tuhhseriesidDS-
crisitem.author.deptProduktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik M-17-
crisitem.author.deptProduktentwicklung und Konstruktionstechnik M-17-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1996-411X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1253-1699-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Maschinenbau-
crisitem.author.parentorgStudiendekanat Maschinenbau-
Appears in Collections:Publications without fulltext
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

70
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Mar 25, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Add Files to Item

Note about this record

Export

Items in TORE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.