Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.2793
Publisher DOI: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2020.100043
Title: Hydrogen and hydrogen-derived fuels through methane decomposition of natural gas – GHG emissions and costs
Language: English
Authors: Timmerberg, Sebastian 
Kaltschmitt, Martin 
Finkbeiner, Matthias 
Keywords: Blue hydrogen;Hydrogen production;Methane decomposition;Pyrolysis
Issue Date: 4-May-2020
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: Energy Conversion and Management: X (7): 100043 (2020-09-01)
Journal or Series Name: Energy conversion and management: X 
Abstract (english): Hydrogen can be produced from the decomposition of methane (also called pyrolysis). Many studies assume that this process emits few greenhouse gas (GHG) because the reaction from methane to hydrogen yields only solid carbon and no CO2. This paper assesses the life-cycle GHG emissions and the levelized costs for hydrogen provision from methane decomposition in three configurations (plasma, molten metal, and thermal gas). The results of these configurations are then compared to electrolysis and steam methane reforming (SMR) with and without CO2 capture and storage (CCS). Under the global natural gas supply chain conditions, hydrogen from methane decomposition still causes significant GHG emissions between 43 and 97 g CO2-eq./MJ. The bandwidth is predominately determined by the energy source providing the process heat, i.e. the lowest emissions are caused by the plasma system using renewable electricity. This configuration shows lower GHG emissions compared to the “classical” SMR (99 g CO2-eq./MJ) but similar emissions to the SMR with CCS (46 g CO2-eq./MJ). However, only electrolysis powered with renewable electricity leads to very low GHG emissions (3 g CO2-eq./MJ). Overall, the natural gas supply is a decisive factor in determining GHG emissions. A natural gas supply with below-global average GHG emissions can lead to lower GHG emissions of all methane decomposition configurations compared to SMR. Methane decomposition systems (1.6 to 2.2 €/kg H2) produce hydrogen at costs substantially higher compared to SMR (1.0 to 1.2 €/kg) but lower than electrolyser (2.5 to 3.0 €/kg). SMR with CCS has the lowest CO2 abatement costs (24 €/t CO2-eq., other > 141 €/t CO2-eq.). Finally, fuels derived from different hydrogen supply options are assessed. Substantially lower GHG emissions, compared to the fossil reference (natural gas and diesel/gasoline), are only possible if hydrogen from electrolysis powered by renewable energy is used (>90% less). The other hydrogen pathways cause only slightly lower or even higher GHG emissions.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11420/6245
DOI: 10.15480/882.2793
ISSN: 2590-1745
Institute: Umwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft V-9 
Type: (wissenschaftlicher) Artikel
Appears in Collections:Publications with fulltext

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1-s2.0-S2590174520300155-main.pdfVerlags-PDF2,95 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

57
Last Week
2
Last month
checked on Jul 14, 2020

Download(s)

34
checked on Jul 14, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Note about this record

Export

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons