Innovation dynamics across institutional environments: regulatory exposure and geopolitical shocks in nanotechnology

Nanotechnology represents a general-purpose technology with significant transformative potential across industrial sectors. Its commercialization, however, unfolds within regulatory systems that differ across application domains and countries, making institutional exposure a strategic condition rather than a background factor. This study examines how geopolitical shocks and EU nano-specific regulatory provisions are associated with nanotechnology patenting in the United States, Germany, and Japan from 2004 to 2023. We contribute to innovation-management and institutional-theory debates by linking three elements that are usually analyzed separately: application-domain selection, regulatory exposure, and crisis-period innovation responses. A structured Scopus search, confirmed with Scite, is used to consolidate nanotechnology applications into eight market-relevant domains, which are then mapped to EU regulatory instruments. Patent counts are analyzed with PPML estimations and a Germany-focused difference-in-differences/event-study design. The results show strong positive shock-period patenting in the United States, weaker German responses, and a post-2020 relative decline in Germany’s nano-specific regulated domains. The study offers managers a transparent and auditable framework for evaluating nanotechnology portfolios through technological potential, regulatory exposure, and institutional responsiveness.

Subjects

geopolitics

innovation management

Nanotechnology

patent analysis

regulations

DDC Class

338: Production

658.5: Of Production

Lizenz

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Publication version

publishedVersion

Name

Innovation dynamics across institutional environments regulatory exposure and geopolitical shocks in nanotechnology.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

1.22 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Options

Innovation dynamics across institutional environments: regulatory exposure and geopolitical shocks in nanotechnology