TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publications
  4. Metamodels for evaluating, calibrating and applying agent-based models : a review
 
Options

Metamodels for evaluating, calibrating and applying agent-based models : a review

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.3636
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2020-03-31
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Pietzsch, Bruno  
Fiedler, Sebastian  
Mertens, Kai G.  
Richter, Markus  
Scherer, Cédric  
Widyastuti, Kirana  
Wimmler, Marie-Christin  
Zakharova, Liubov  
Berger, Uta  
Institut
Controlling und Simulation W-1  
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.3636
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/7319
Journal
The Journal of academic social science studies  
Volume
23
Issue
2
Article Number
9
Citation
JASSS 2 (23) : 9 (2020)
Publisher DOI
10.18564/jasss.4274
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85083308161
Publisher
Fırat Üniversitesi
The recent advancement of agent-based modeling is characterized by higher demands on the pa-rameterization, evaluation and documentation of these computationally expensive models. Accordingly, there is also a growing request for “easy to go” applications just mimicking the input-output behavior of such mod-els. Metamodels are being increasingly used for these tasks. In this paper, we provide an overview of common metamodel types and the purposes of their usage in an agent-based modeling context. To guide modelers in the selection and application of metamodels for their own needs, we further assessed their implementation effort and performance. We performed a literature research in January 2019 using four different databases. Five different terms paraphrasing metamodels (approximation, emulator, meta-model, metamodel and surrogate) were used to capture the whole range of relevant literature in all disciplines. All metamodel applications found were then categorized into specific metamodel types and rated by different junior and senior researches from varying disciplines (including forest sciences, landscape ecology, or economics) regarding the implementation effort and performance. Specifically, we captured the metamodel performance according to (i) the consider-ation of uncertainties, (ii) the suitability assessment provided by the authors for the particular purpose, and (iii) the number of valuation criteria provided for suitability assessment. We selected 40 distinct metamodel applications from studies published in peer-reviewed journals from 2005 to 2019. These were used for the sensitivity analysis, calibration and upscaling of agent-based models, as well to mimic their prediction for different scenarios. This review provides information about the most applicable metamodel types for each purpose and forms a first guidance for the implementation and validation of metamodels for agent-based models.
Subjects
calibration
emulator
individual-based model
review
sensitivity analysis
surrogate model
DDC Class
330: Wirtschaft
Funding Organisations
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)  
Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU)
More Funding Information
German Federal Environmental Foundation (DBU)
German Research Foundation (DFG project TI 824/3-1)
Publication version
publishedVersion
Lizenz
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Pietzsch-2020-Metamodels-for-evaluating-calibrati.pdf

Size

796.98 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback