TUHH Open Research
Help
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  • English
  • Deutsch
  • Communities & Collections
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • People
  • Institutions
  • Projects
  • Statistics
  1. Home
  2. TUHH
  3. Publication References
  4. A GHG reduction obligation for sustainableaviation fuels (SAF) in the EU and in Germany
 
Options

A GHG reduction obligation for sustainableaviation fuels (SAF) in the EU and in Germany

Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2021-05
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Bullerdiek, Nils 
Neuling, Ulf  orcid-logo
Kaltschmitt, Martin  
Institut
Umwelttechnik und Energiewirtschaft V-9  
TORE-URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11420/8662
Journal
Journal of air transport management  
Volume
92
Article Number
102020
Citation
Journal of Air Transport Management (92): 102020 (2021-05)
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102020
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85099704585
Despite various legal drivers already in place, a large-scale use of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) is still missing. Thus, bringing SAF for GHG reduction reasons into the day-to-day business more effective market injection mechanisms are needed. In this context, direct and indirect effects of a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction obligation in the EU and in Germany are analysed, considering an obligation level of 2% in 2023 increasing stepwise to 10% by 2030 following the goals derived from transport-related RED II targets. For such GHG reduction obligations referred to the entire EU 27 and the entire German aviation fuel uplifts, obligation induced SAF demands possibly exceed future SAF production quantities by a factor of about two without effective capacity expansion exceeding the published expansion plans. The considered SAF options lead to an aviation fuel price increases of 5–45% referring to a conventional aviation fuel price of 550 €/t. Aviation related EU ETS and German aviation tax revenues are mostly insufficient to significantly cover obligation-induced SAF costs or additional fuel costs. Fostering a broad spectrum of SAF technologies will thus require obligation related sub-mechanisms, due to (significantly) different SAF compliance costs. Thereby, sub-mandates represent the most effective approach. In terms of obligation avoidance measures, tankering – in contrast to three re-routing options considered – is likely to be economically feasible for airlines and requires appropriate countermeasures.
Subjects
Aviation
GHG reduction obligation
Market injection mechanism
SAF
SAF mandate
SAF market Implementation
Steering mechanism
Sustainable aviation fuel
TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback