Options
Unpacking Performance Factors of Innovation Systems and Studying Germany’s Attempt to Foster the Role of the Patient Through a Market Access Pathway for Digital Health Applications (DiGAs): Exploratory Mixed Methods Study
Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.14227
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2025-01-06
Sprache
English
TORE-DOI
Volume
27
Issue
e66356
Citation
Journal of medical internet research 27: e66356 (2025-01-06)
Publisher DOI
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
Peer Reviewed
true
Background: Health care innovation faces significant challenges, including system inertia and diverse stakeholders, making
regulated market access pathways essential for facilitating the adoption of new technologies. The German Digital Healthcare
Act, introduced in 2019, offers a model by enabling digital health applications (DiGAs) to be reimbursed by statutory health
insurance, improving market access and patient empowerment. However, the factors influencing the success of these pathways
in driving innovation remain unclear.
Objective: This study aims to identify the key performance factors of the innovation system shaped by the patient-relevant
structural and procedural improvement (pSVV) pathway within the DiGA model. By examining how this pathway supports the
entry of innovative digital health technologies, we seek to uncover the systemic dynamics that influence its effectiveness in
fostering patient-centered digital health solutions.
Methods: This study, conducted from May 2023 to November 2024, used a mixed methods approach. A descriptive analysis
assessed how DiGA manufacturers use positive health care effects, giving a market overview of the pSVV technology. A qualitative
analysis using grounded theory and Gioia methodology provided insights into stakeholder perspectives, focusing on manufacturers
and regulatory bodies. A functional-structural analysis examined how components of the innovation system, such as actors,
institutions, interactions, and infrastructure, interact and impact the effectiveness of the pathway.
Results: The descriptive analysis showed that only 11 (20%) of the 56 DiGAs available in Germany used the pSVV pathway,
with only 1 (2%) provisionally listed DiGA using pSVV as a primary end point; 6 of 9 (67%) pSVV key areas were used. The
qualitative analysis revealed that manufacturers prioritize demonstrating medical benefits over pSVV due to evidence requirements
and uncertainties around pSVV acceptance. Operational barriers hindered the adoption of pSVV , despite a positive reception
among stakeholders. The systemic analysis identified key issues, including a lack of entrepreneurial focus on pSVV , limited
regulatory experience, inadequate measurement methods, and entrenched practices prioritizing medical benefits, that hinder
market formation and legitimacy.
Conclusions: This study identifies key factors for effectively implementing innovation systems through regulated market access
pathways, including content and format security, clearer framework specification, active innovation process management, and
market formation stimulation. Addressing these factors can reduce uncertainties and promote wider adoption of digital health
technologies. The findings highlight the need for future research on patient empowerment and the development of methodologies
beyond traditional therapeutic outcomes.
regulated market access pathways essential for facilitating the adoption of new technologies. The German Digital Healthcare
Act, introduced in 2019, offers a model by enabling digital health applications (DiGAs) to be reimbursed by statutory health
insurance, improving market access and patient empowerment. However, the factors influencing the success of these pathways
in driving innovation remain unclear.
Objective: This study aims to identify the key performance factors of the innovation system shaped by the patient-relevant
structural and procedural improvement (pSVV) pathway within the DiGA model. By examining how this pathway supports the
entry of innovative digital health technologies, we seek to uncover the systemic dynamics that influence its effectiveness in
fostering patient-centered digital health solutions.
Methods: This study, conducted from May 2023 to November 2024, used a mixed methods approach. A descriptive analysis
assessed how DiGA manufacturers use positive health care effects, giving a market overview of the pSVV technology. A qualitative
analysis using grounded theory and Gioia methodology provided insights into stakeholder perspectives, focusing on manufacturers
and regulatory bodies. A functional-structural analysis examined how components of the innovation system, such as actors,
institutions, interactions, and infrastructure, interact and impact the effectiveness of the pathway.
Results: The descriptive analysis showed that only 11 (20%) of the 56 DiGAs available in Germany used the pSVV pathway,
with only 1 (2%) provisionally listed DiGA using pSVV as a primary end point; 6 of 9 (67%) pSVV key areas were used. The
qualitative analysis revealed that manufacturers prioritize demonstrating medical benefits over pSVV due to evidence requirements
and uncertainties around pSVV acceptance. Operational barriers hindered the adoption of pSVV , despite a positive reception
among stakeholders. The systemic analysis identified key issues, including a lack of entrepreneurial focus on pSVV , limited
regulatory experience, inadequate measurement methods, and entrenched practices prioritizing medical benefits, that hinder
market formation and legitimacy.
Conclusions: This study identifies key factors for effectively implementing innovation systems through regulated market access
pathways, including content and format security, clearer framework specification, active innovation process management, and
market formation stimulation. Addressing these factors can reduce uncertainties and promote wider adoption of digital health
technologies. The findings highlight the need for future research on patient empowerment and the development of methodologies
beyond traditional therapeutic outcomes.
DDC Class
330: Economics
360: Social Problems, Social Services
610: Medicine, Health
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Name
jmir-2025-1-e66356.pdf
Type
Main Article
Size
1.16 MB
Format
Adobe PDF