TUHH Open Research
Help
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Communities & Collections
Publications
Research Data
People
Institutions
Projects
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Publications
  4. Does nonstationarity affect GAN-based downscaling? Insights from high-resolution WRF simulations over the Canadian prairies

Does nonstationarity affect GAN-based downscaling? Insights from high-resolution WRF simulations over the Canadian prairies

Citation Link: https://doi.org/10.15480/882.18857
Publikationstyp
Journal Article
Date Issued
2026-04-20
Sprache
English
Author(s)
Abdelmoaty, Hebatallah M.
Papalexiou, Simon Michael
Global Water Security B-2
Mamalakis, Antonios
Singh, Shivam
Coia, Vincenzo
Hairabedian, Melissa
Szeftel, Pascal
Grover, Patrick
TORE-DOI
10.15480/882.18857
TORE-URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11420/65290
Journal
Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems
Volume
5
Issue
2
Article Number
250093
Citation
Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems 5 (2): 250093 (2026)
Publisher DOI
10.1175/AIES-D-25-0093.1
Publisher
Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
Although downscaling models are typically trained on historical data and then applied to future projections, this practice raises concerns about their ability to reproduce nonstationary climate signals. While such limitations are expected for traditional statistical approaches, deep learning models have the potential to learn a more generalizable downscaling relationship, separating the transformation task from the nonstationary signal. In this study, we examine the sensitivity of deep learning–based downscaling to nonstationarity using Wasserstein generative adversarial networks (WGANs) to downscale hourly precipitation from 50 to 4 km over the Canadian Prairies. We trained two models on convection-permitting Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) simulations: one on a historical period (2000–15) and another on a future period (2086–2100). Four setups were considered: hh (trained/tested on historical), ff (trained/tested on future), fh (trained on future/tested on historical), and hf (trained on historical/tested on future). Within-climate models (hh and ff) reproduced spatial heterogeneity more effectively, with better spatial correlations and realistic variability, while all four reproduced temporal autocorrelation. Extremes remain a challenge, yet with negative biases, in terms of hourly precipitation upper percentiles (75th, 95th, 99th, and 99.9th) and daily maxima. The hh and ff cases performed best; the fh case benefited from exposure to stronger extremes during training, while hf performed poorest due to weak generalization. Importantly, however, cross-climate model biases (hf and fh) were not substantially larger than within-climate ones. These findings highlight the challenge of training on stationary data for nonstationary climates but also demonstrate the potential of WGANs to mitigate such limitations.
Subjects
Downscaling
Nonstationarity
Regional models
Deep learning
DDC Class
551: Geology, Hydrology Meteorology
519: Applied Mathematics, Probabilities
006.31: Machine Learning
Lizenz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publication version
publishedVersion
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

aies-AIES-D-25-0093.1.pdf

Type

Main Article

Size

22.33 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

TUHH
Weiterführende Links
  • Contact
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • Impress
DSpace Software

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science
Design by effective webwork GmbH

  • Deutsche NationalbibliothekDeutsche Nationalbibliothek
  • ORCiD Member OrganizationORCiD Member Organization
  • DataCiteDataCite
  • Re3DataRe3Data
  • OpenDOAROpenDOAR
  • OpenAireOpenAire
  • BASE Bielefeld Academic Search EngineBASE Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Feedback